A Critique of the Book Prophetess of Health

The Relation of the Testimony to the Visions

The testimony that Ellen White bore was related to the visions in four different ways. First the testimony she bore might be (a) a direct account of a single vision. For instance, she says, “August 24, 1850, I saw,” and then she tells what she saw. CBPH 123.5

It might be (b) a composite account of many visions given over a period of many years, as is true of the Conflict of the Ages series. In her introduction to The Great Controversy she explains this: CBPH 123.6

Through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, the scenes of the long-continued conflict between good and evil have been opened to the writer of these pages. From time to time I have been permitted to behold the working, in different ages, of the great controversy between Christ, the Prince of life, the Author of our salvation, and Satan, the prince of evil, the author of sin.—Page x. CBPH 123.7

Mrs. White here informs us that from time to time she saw parts of the history transpire and then she put it together as one great composite account as we have it in the Conflict of the Ages series. This was increasingly so as she amplified the account. CBPH 123.8

The third relationship would be (c) that Ellen White is giving counsel based on one specific vision. Note; “In the night of March 2, 1907, many things were revealed to me regarding the value of our publications.”—Testimonies for the Church 9:65. Then she gives counsel, but she doesn’t tell just what she was shown. The counsel was based on that vision. CBPH 123.9

Or it might be (d) counsel based upon many visions. She writes, “God has given me a testimony of reproof for parents who treat their children as you do your little one.”—Ellen G. White Letter 1, 1877. CBPH 123.10

The Lord is sparing of miracles. He did not give a vision for each family, but she had been given a vision with light for parents who treated their children a certain way. When she found other parents treating their children the same way, what she had been shown regarding a similar case would fit their experience, too. She had a message for them. CBPH 123.11

Here is another illustration: CBPH 123.12

This matter has been brought before my mind, in other cases, where individuals have claimed to have messages for the Seventh-day Adventist Church, of a similar character, and the word has been given me, “Believe them not.”—Selected Messages 2:63, 64. CBPH 123.13

As we understand these four ways in which the testimony that Ellen White bore is related to the visions we can see how people could come and talk with Sister White and she would give an answer to questions that was accepted as a message from God. Her answer was based on the visions—perhaps one given recently or on many given over a period of years. On the other hand, she might be strangely silent, conversing pleasantly, but having nothing to say on the point—no answer to the questions. She did not dare project herself, setting forth her own ideas. CBPH 123.14

In the Ralph Mackin case of 1908 she listened patiently, made discreet inquiries, but could give no positive word till God a few days after the interview gave her specific light that his experience of speaking in tongues was not inspired by Him. CBPH 123.15