The Ellen G. White Writings

93/93

ELLEN G. WHITE’S STATEMENT REGARDING THE 1911 EDITION OF “GREAT CONTROVERSY”

Sanitarium, Cal., July 25, 1911

Dear Brother Wilcox: EGWW 191.3

A few days ago I received a copy of the new edition of the book “Great Controversy,” recently printed at Mountain View, and also a similar copy printed at Washington. The book pleases me. I have spent many hours looking through its pages, and I see that the publishing houses have done good work. EGWW 191.4

The book “Great Controversy” I appreciate above silver or gold, and I greatly desire that it shall come before the people. While writing the manuscript of “Great Controversy,” I was often conscious of the presence of the angels of God. And many times the scenes about which I was writing were presented to me anew in visions of the night, so that they were fresh and vivid in my mind. EGWW 191.5

Recently it was necessary for this book to be reset, because the electrotype plates were badly worn. It has cost me much to have this done, but I do not complain; for whatever the cost may be, I regard this new edition with great satisfaction. EGWW 192.1

Yesterday I read what W. C. White has recently written to Canvassing Agents and responsible men at our publishing houses regarding this latest edition of “Great Controversy,” and I think he has presented the matter correctly and well. EGWW 192.2

When I learned that “Great Controversy” must be reset, I determined that we would have everything closely examined, to see if the truths it contained were stated in the very best manner, to convince those not of our faith that the Lord had guided and sustained me in the writing of its pages. EGWW 192.3

As a result of the thorough examination by our most experienced workers, some changing in the wording has been proposed. These changes I have carefully examined, and approved. I am thankful that my life has been spared, and that I have strength and clearness of mind for this and other literary work.... EGWW 192.4

(Signed) Ellen Gould White
E. G. White Letter 56, 1911