Search for: Storrs*
101 The Atonement, p. 132.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
George Storrs, of New York, in a small work on the Atonement, rejected the idea of Christ dying in the stead of the sinner; and his views ought to be noticed, especially …
102 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 6.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… . George Storrs, of New York, who has in a manner led off in the non-resurrection theory, being the only one who has published any considerable work on the subject …
103 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 7.4 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs has departed widely from Bible truth; and in his effort to prove what God must or ought to do, in order to be just, he has directly contradicted what …
104 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 8.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs says it is not dying, but “to be dead.” If so, it should read, Thou shalt surely be dead. The soul that sinneth, it shall be dead. The wages of sin is to be dead …
105 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 8.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs’ showing, so much of manifest injustice on the part of the Being who inflicts the penalty! And it would therefore be necessary for God to insure an …
106 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 9.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs’ exposition of principles is without foundation in truth. But if they are not, as Mr. Storrs asserts, then, according to his theory, these threats can …
107 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 9.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Such is the tendency of Mr. Storrs’ position on which he bases his non-resurrection theory. As said before, we may well call in question any argument based on such premises, or conclusion drawn from them.
108 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 10.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… . Mr. Storrs denies that 1 Corinthians 15:22, has any reference to “all men;” yet he does not deny the fact that all men do actually die in Adam, but states it in the following …
109 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 13.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Elders Storrs and Curry on this point. In so doing he made the proper distinction between benevolence and mercy. I hope all of that party will soon do themselves …
110 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 14.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Mr. Curry, as well as Mr. Storrs, professed to place his first and chief reliance on “principles.” The following is one laid down by him:
111 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 15.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs. But they must certainly have singular ideas of justice, as announced in such a “principle;” for they have every one of the justified paying the same …
112 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 16.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs and Mr. Curry make a point and lay much stress on the supposed distinction between the “blood-life” and “spirit-life;” their position being that the blood …
113 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 17.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
And Mr. Storrs says:
114 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 18.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
See the following statements. Says Mr. Storrs:
115 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 19.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Eld. Storrs, (1) A resurrection is a peculiarity of the gospel, and of course is inadmissible outside the gospel. (2) It belongs to the church-to believers in Christ …
116 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 19.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
And Mr. Curry, who seemed to closely follow Mr. Storrs, is equally unfortunate in his expressions on this subject. He laid down the following as an “unanswerable principle:”
117 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 22.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Mr. Storrs claims that it would be unjust to inflict the same penalty a second time; and so much stress is laid on this idea that it demands a notice, though the …
118 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 22.3 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs’ remarks on the judgment of Adam present that fact in a striking view. He says:
119 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 23.3 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs’ own showing, that dispensation or probation ended with that “one transgression,” and judgment set, and sentence was pronounced on the act; but the …
120 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 24.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… Mr. Storrs correctly says. We had no trial of obedience or disobedience in that first judgment, though we fall under its consequences by virtue of our nature …