Search for: argument
14661 Facts of Faith, p. 171.2 (Christian Edwardson)
Dr. William Robertson gives the same facts in the “History of the Reign of the Emperor Charles the Fifth,” Vol. 1, pp. 460-463, as have been quoted from Dr. Coxe. In a footnote Dr. Robertson adds the following of Tetzel’s arguments:
14662 Facts of Faith, p. 185.2 (Christian Edwardson)
… an argument in which two groups of Sunday-keepers were engaged, and in which each in his own way was trying to present reasons for the observance of the first …
14663 Facts of Faith, p. 198.6 (Christian Edwardson)
… another argument in favor of the claims of the Pope; since Antichrist simulates Christ, and the Pope is an image of Christ, Antichrist must have some similarity …
14664 Facts of Faith, p. 203.3 (Christian Edwardson)
There were two arguments used against the position taken by the Reformers which have puzzled many:
14665 Facts of Faith, p. 204.1 (Christian Edwardson)
… . This argument has seemed so logical and conclusive that Protestants, to a large extent, have given up the Protestant doctrine that the Papacy is Antichrist …
14666 Facts of Faith, p. 204.2 (Christian Edwardson)
This argument, however, is based on a misunderstanding, caused by overlooking one word in the text. Antichrist was not to deny that Christ had come in flesh …
14667 Facts of Faith, p. 295.4 (Christian Edwardson)
Dr. Martin Luther and Melancthon felt the stinging force of this Catholic argument in proof of the power of the papal church, although they knew that the time had not then come for a Sabbath reform. Dr. Eck, disputing with Luther, said:
14668 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 31 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
II. Creation in “Image of God” Not a Valid Argument
14669 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 33.1 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
As to the fundamental fallacy involved in this foray into logic, in the contention noted, the argument may he fairly set forth, in syllogistic form, thus:
14670 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 33.6 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… , the argument from logic breaks down under the impact of this logical parallelism, as well as the contravening testimony of Scripture. We consequently maintain …
14671 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 33.7 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… technical arguments will be presented separately.) Man was driven out of the Garden, and cherubim and flaming sword were set up to prevent access to the indispensable …
14672 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 51.3 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… his arguments ( Genesis 3:1 ). In this way Satan secured the downfall of Adam, and thus of the race. But the covenant-promise subsequently made to Adam assures the …
14673 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 77 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
IV. Supreme Argument Against Eternal Torment
14674 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 78.2 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… supreme argument against the alien concept of the Eternal Torment of the sinner: If the death that threatened Adam were eternal torture, then it would have …
14675 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 160 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
CHAPTER TEN: Weak Arguments Formulate Unworthy Platform
14676 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 168 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
1. RECOURSE TO WEAK ARGUMENTS AN UNWORTHY PROCEDURE
14677 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 172.4 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… second argument in behalf of conscious persistence of the soul after death likewise collapses.
14678 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 233.4 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… the argument that Christ used to silence the Sadducees—not the uninterrupted survival of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but resurrection ( Luke 20:37, 38 ). So the resurrection …
14679 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 241.3 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… or argument, because of their circumstantial settings and indirect character. The Latin expression, Omnia similia claudicunt (“All comparisons limp”), is …
14680 The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 1, p. 249.3 (LeRoy Edwin Froom)
… ”)—an argument directed at, and appealing to, their prejudices rather than to their intellect.