Search for: argument
14521 In Defense of the Faith, p. 47.3 (William Henry Branson)
… his argument would lead to just this conclusion; for, says Paul, “where no law is, there is no transgression.” Romans 4:15. And again, “Sin is not imputed where there …
14522 In Defense of the Faith, p. 50.3 (William Henry Branson)
… the argument that nine of the Ten Commandments are re-enacted in the New Testament, but that the fourth one is left out. Note how fully Mr. Canright the Adventist …
14523 In Defense of the Faith, p. 52.2 (William Henry Branson)
Farther on in this same work Mr. Canright pointed out the utter fallacy of his later argument that nine of the commandments which had been abolished were restored in the New Testament. On this point, speaking still as an Adventist, he said:
14524 In Defense of the Faith, p. 52.4 (William Henry Branson)
… every argument framed against the Sabbath comes with equal force against the other commandments.
14525 In Defense of the Faith, p. 55.1 (William Henry Branson)
How utterly astonishing it is to find this same man only a few years later setting forth the very arguments which he himself had so completely overthrown.
14526 In Defense of the Faith, p. 56.3 (William Henry Branson)
Surely this is a strange argument! Think of it! The only thing that deterred God from writing all the ceremonies, rites, ordinances, etc., pertaining to the sacrificial service, was the size of the load it would have made to carry!
14527 In Defense of the Faith, p. 58.1 (William Henry Branson)
In a further effort to establish his no-law doctrine Mr. Canright the Baptist tries to find an argument for his theory in Paul’s statement, “You are not under the law, but under grace.” Romans 6:14. On this he says:
14528 In Defense of the Faith, p. 58.4 (William Henry Branson)
… entire argument in this book shows that this is not his meaning.
14529 In Defense of the Faith, p. 58.5 (William Henry Branson)
… whole argument shows that is what he means. ‘For sin shall not have dominion over you; for you are not under the law, but under grace.’ Verse 14, That is, having broken …
14530 In Defense of the Faith, p. 63.1 (William Henry Branson)
… his argument on this point by declaring, “That ends the Ten Commandments.”— Seventh-day Adventism Renounced, p. 334. But Mr. Canright, while still a Seventh-day Adventist …
14531 In Defense of the Faith, p. 64.1 (William Henry Branson)
When Mr. Canright renounced Adventism he boldly declared that the law of God was dead. His argument for this is based on the following statement by the apostle Paul:
14532 In Defense of the Faith, p. 64.6 (William Henry Branson)
… this argument that the law is dead, is evidenced by a former extended statement published by him concerning the true meaning of this text. Let us note how, in …
14533 In Defense of the Faith, p. 70.2 (William Henry Branson)
Now we will again permit Mr. Canright to reply to his own arguments. While he was still an advocate of the binding claims of the Ten Commandments, he wrote an excellent treatise on this subject, from which we take the following paragraphs:
14534 In Defense of the Faith, p. 80.6 (William Henry Branson)
… his arguments of that time on the Sabbath question with those set forth in his book in which he attempts to refute his former teachings. Fortunately these …
14535 In Defense of the Faith, p. 92.1 (William Henry Branson)
… later arguments on this point. We will quote at some length from this tract in order that the reader may see how fully and completely he has answered himself …
14536 In Defense of the Faith, p. 92.2 (William Henry Branson)
… the argument of ‘lost time’ may be called the ‘last ditch.’ When all other arguments fail, persons fall back upon this, and excuse themselves from any further trouble …
14537 In Defense of the Faith, p. 93.1 (William Henry Branson)
… the argument of lost time. Surprising indeed it is to hear this argument used by those who profess a great regard for the Sabbath commandment, and for Sunday …
14538 In Defense of the Faith, p. 102.1 (William Henry Branson)
… insurmountable argument which cap never be set aside by those who assert that the Sabbath has been lost. God has preserved a whole nation of witnesses, and …
14539 In Defense of the Faith, p. 110.1 (William Henry Branson)
One of Mr. Canright’s strong arguments against the Sabbath commandment is that it is not entirely moral in its nature, but partly ceremonial, and was therefore of temporary obligation only. On this point, after becoming a Baptist, he wrote:
14540 In Defense of the Faith, p. 110.5 (William Henry Branson)
… own argument.