Search for: argument
8681 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 538.1 (Uriah Smith)
… no argument to show, and even the statement is unnecessary, that this is precisely the profession of the American government. Article IV, sec. 4 of the Constitution …
8682 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 557.2 (Uriah Smith)
… the arguments usually relied upon to prove the Sunday Sabbath, and showing that its only authority is the Catholic Church.
8683 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 559.1 (Uriah Smith)
… extended argument on the Sabbath question, and an exposition of the origin and nature of the observance of the first day of the week. Let us submit this one …
8684 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 562.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of argument leading to these conclusions is so direct and well-defined that there is no avoiding them. They are a clear and logical sequence from the premises …
8685 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 562.3 (Uriah Smith)
… the argument, new features of strength have been discovered in the application; and amid a storm of scornful incredulity we have watched the progress of …
8686 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 570.3 (Uriah Smith)
… clear argument showing that the seventh day, and not the first day, is the Sabbath of the Bible.
8687 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 587.3 (Uriah Smith)
… this argument, should set every pulse bounding, and every heart beating high with a sense of the thrilling importance of this hour.
8688 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 589.1 (Uriah Smith)
… by argument; and hence we inquire for the evidence that the Reformers made any such proclamation. Their teaching has been very fully recorded, and their writings …
8689 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 590.4 (Uriah Smith)
… . The argument on the two preceding points has done much to establish the present proposition; for if the message has not been given in the past, and cannot be …
8690 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 591.1 (Uriah Smith)
… and argument under Daniel 9:24-27 .) We call his investigations a consistent study of the prophecies, because he adopted that rule of interpretation which …
8691 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 598.3 (Uriah Smith)
… the argument on the seventy weeks and twenty-three hundred days in Daniel 9; that it was in the nature of the event to occur at the end of those days, has been shown …
8692 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 602.1 (Uriah Smith)
… . The argument relied upon to show that the city of Rome is the Babylon of the Apocalypse runs thus: “The angel told John that the woman which he had seen was the …
8693 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 603.2 (Uriah Smith)
… foregoing argument, it follows that the “woman” cannot represent a literal city; for the mountains upon which the woman sitteth being symbolic, a literal city …
8694 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 621.2 (Uriah Smith)
The arguments on the two preceding messages fix the chronology of the third, and show that it belongs to the present time; but, as in the case of the former, the …
8695 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 622.1 (Uriah Smith)
… the argument on the time was wrong, and immediately went to work to readjust the prophetic periods, and set a new time for the Lord to come — a work in which they …
8696 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 622.2 (Uriah Smith)
… the argument on the sanctuary pretends to dispute this point. Thus the Sabbath reform was brought to view; and it was seen that whatever had been done in opposition …
8697 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 624.1 (Uriah Smith)
… . The arguments we need not here repeat; it will be sufficient to recapitulate the points established.
8698 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 628.2 (Uriah Smith)
… the argument on the seal of God, as given in chapter 7. It was there shown that sign, seal, mark, and token are synonymous terms, and that God takes his Sabbath to …
8699 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 629.1 (Uriah Smith)
… this argument, attaches to the seventh day, the reader may ask for some evidence that a person cannot be said to keep the commandments of God unless he does …
8700 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 631.3 (Uriah Smith)
10. It is the “Lord’s day” of Revelation 1:10. (See argument on that verse.)