Search for: ${reference}
8201 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 14.2 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. Sentence corrected to read: “I shall not die, but live, and again declare the evil deeds of the friars.” Footnote reference given to D’Aubigne.
8202 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 14.3 (Arthur Lacey White)
… no reference is given. As these are very important pronouncements, they ought to have proper authority back of them. The same is true of the decree mentioned …
8203 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 14.6 (Arthur Lacey White)
… .’” (Footnote reference to Wylie given.)
8204 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 14.7 (Arthur Lacey White)
On the second suggestion regarding the wording which reads: “After a time it was decreed that all who departed from the Romish worship should be burned.” The 1888 book carries no reference nor is reference given in the 1911 edition .
8205 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 14.9 (Arthur Lacey White)
… added referring to “Indulgences.”
8206 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 15.4 (Arthur Lacey White)
The words in italics [in the 1888 book], and quoted, being of so much importance and involving so serious a charge against the papacy, ought to have a proper reference for them.
8207 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 15.7 (Arthur Lacey White)
… .’” Footnote reference given Lenfant, History of the Council of Constance, volume 1, page 516.
8208 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 16.2 (Arthur Lacey White)
The quotation from Tetzel at the top of the page, if authoritative, ought to have suitable reference.
8209 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 16.3 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. Footnote reference to D’Aubigne given.
8210 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 16.10 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. The translation approved by D’Aubigne, was employed which called for some change in wording. The reference was given.
8211 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 17.5 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted as to precision of statement, but argument well supported by an extended Appendix note, quoting and giving references.
8212 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 17.9 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. Appendix note with references added.
8213 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 17.10 (Arthur Lacey White)
… definite reference for them, as I fully expect that we shall be called to strict account for all these statements at some time in the future.
8214 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 19.3 (Arthur Lacey White)
Reference is again made to the year 1798, on the basis of its being the date for the end of the 1260 years. On the same page the French Revolution is called “the Revolution of 1793;” but at the top of page 282, it is said:
8215 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 20.8 (Arthur Lacey White)
… authoritative reference for this paragraph concerning the reception of the news in Rome?
8216 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 20.9 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. Footnote reference supplied.
8217 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 20.10 (Arthur Lacey White)
… 287, reference is made to a decree passed in 1793, prohibiting the Bible, and the rescinding of the same decree three years and a half later. Both of these statements …
8218 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 20.11 (Arthur Lacey White)
… any reference to any such action. Of course, if this cannot be established, it will affect quite a number of paragraphs based upon this statement.
8219 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 22.2 (Arthur Lacey White)
Response : Criticism accepted. Footnote references given and wording of quotation changed to harmonize with accepted D’Aubigne wording.
8220 W. W. Prescott and the 1911 Edition of The Great Controversy, p. 22.10 (Arthur Lacey White)
At the bottom of the page reference is made to the decree prohibiting the Bible, to which attention has already been called.