Search for: 34
40481 Thoughts on Baptism, p. 187 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
9:26, 49 10:34, 14
40482 Thoughts on Baptism, p. 188 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
2:33, 55 2:38, 39, 57, 62, 69, 73, 126 2:41, 18 3:25, 74 8:15-17, 126 8:16 62 8:26-38, 41, 56 10:6, 47, 48, 18, 56 15:6-9, 126 16:13-15, 90 16:31-34, 91 16:32, 33, 18 18:8, 92 19:1-5, 57, 59, 62 20:29, 30, 184 22:16, 125
40483 Thoughts on Baptism, p. 189.34 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
The Truth Found. By J. H. Waggoner. 10 cts.
40484 The Truth Found, p. 2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… AGREE 34 THE LAST DAYS 37 A SHORT ARGUMENT FOR THE SABBATH 43 I. WHAT DOES GOD’S WORD TEACH CONCERNING THE SABBATH? 44 II. WHAT DOES THE NEW TESTAMENT TEACH CONCERNING …
40485 The Truth Found, p. 34.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Everything that is necessary to give importance to the day—that is calculated to induce a proper observance of the day—is produced in favor of the seventh …
40486 The Truth Found, p. 34 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
THE LAW AND THE GOSPEL AGREE
40487 The Truth Found, p. 34.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Some suppose, or seem to suppose, that it is equal to a denial of Christ to keep the ten commandments. At this we are truly surprised. Christ says he kept his Father’s …
40488 The Truth Found, p. 34.3 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
The supposition arises from a misapprehension of the work of our Saviour. Says the scripture, “He appeared, to put away sin.” Hebrews 9:26. “Sin is the transgression …
40489 Vindication of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Unjust, p. 34.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Why did the Saviour stop his reading so abruptly, without reading the sentence following, so closely connected with that which he read? Evidently because …
40490 Which Day Do You Keep and Why?, p. 4.11 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
ANSWER. ( Matthew 16:24 .) “If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.” Chap. 10:38; Mark 8:34; Luke 9:23; 14:27 .
40491 Which Day Do You Keep and Why?, p. 5.10 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
… 10:34-37; John 15:19; 17:14; 1 Kings 18:17, 18 .
40492 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.1 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
So far I sum up the argument on this and the former proposition as follows:
40493 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.2 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
I. I have undoubtedly approved precedent or example of keeping the Sabbath since the Exodus, while Eld. W. has not shown and cannot show one before that event.
40494 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.3 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
II. Argument No. iii. gives an express statement that the sabbath was given since the Exode, while there is none in favor of an earlier date, and in the nature of things cannot be, since God cannot lie or contradict Himself.
40495 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.4 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
III. All my other arguments, six in number, necessarily imply the giving of the sabbath since the Exode; and Eld. W. has failed to produce a single necessary implication of the giving of the sabbath at creation.
40496 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.5 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
IV. No argument attempted by Eld W. in favor of the first proposition, even if successful, rises above a probable inference, which we have seen in the very outset …
40497 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.6 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
V. The strength of my position is further seen in this: Suppose now that all my arguments are overthrown but one, then the field is still mine, since, whichever argument stands, it is above the probable, and so beyond the reach of his.
40498 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.7 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
From this also follows this conclusion, namely, that Eld. W. has not established a single probability in favor of the first proposition, since the Bible does not furnish a fair probability against itself.
40499 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
ELDER J. H. WAGGONER’S SECOND NEGATIVE
40500 A Written Discussion ... Upon the Sabbath, p. 34.8 (Joseph Harvey Waggoner)
Eld. Vogel’s second affirmative is before me. In this he makes four points, marked IV to VII, which I notice in order.