Search for: ${reference}

51781 In Defense of the Faith, p. 152.18 (William Henry Branson)

28. This is in the prophecy which refers wholly to the Christian dispensation. See Isaiah 56 .

51782 In Defense of the Faith, p. 156.21 (William Henry Branson)

31. Six of these texts refer to the same first day of the week.

51783 In Defense of the Faith, p. 159.2 (William Henry Branson)

… was referring to Sunday. He merely says “the Lord’s day,” and both Jesus and inspired writers insist that the Lord’s day is the original Sabbath. Thus through …

51784 In Defense of the Faith, p. 161.5 (William Henry Branson)

… . Canright refers to Pentecost to show that the Greeks heard the gospel on that occasion, and carried it to the countries in the East. (See The Lord’s Day, by D. M …

51785 In Defense of the Faith, p. 173.4 (William Henry Branson)

… no reference whatever in his law either to the fourth commandment or to the resurrection of Christ. Besides, he expressly exempted the country districts …

51786 In Defense of the Faith, p. 174.2 (William Henry Branson)

… , unfortunately, referred to Sunday by using its pagan name instead of calling it the Lord’s day. It seems to us that Mr. Canright’s Lord’s day argument is built …

51787 In Defense of the Faith, p. 184.1 (William Henry Branson)

… he referred directly to this canon of the Council of Laodicea. But it required repeated councils, actions, bulls, and encyclicals of the bishops and popes …

51788 In Defense of the Faith, p. 197.3 (William Henry Branson)

… Adventists refer to Sunday keeping as the “mark” of the Papacy, or of the beast of Revelation 13, which represents the papal church, they are only agreeing with …

51789 In Defense of the Faith, p. 213.5 (William Henry Branson)

… must refer us to Jesus. Thus it “brings us to Christ.”

51790 In Defense of the Faith, p. 222.5 (William Henry Branson)

… Paul refers to when, he says that God sent His Son to make it possible. “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh …

51791 In Defense of the Faith, p. 255.4 (William Henry Branson)

… Scriptural references to prove it. In another place he takes a parable as though it were a literal happening, says the things in it “occurred between death …

51792 In Defense of the Faith, p. 271.1 (William Henry Branson)

… Paul refers to the sanctuary in the wilderness as “the first tabernacle.” Hence there must have been a second. The first “was a figure for the time then present …

51793 In Defense of the Faith, p. 281.3 (William Henry Branson)

… Paul refers to the dividing veil, he calls it “the second veil”; but when he refers to the first veil, he just says “the veil.” Therefore, when he declared that Christ …

51794 In Defense of the Faith, p. 290.3 (William Henry Branson)

… Daniel refers to the only sanctuary that was in existence at that time, that is, the heavenly.

51795 In Defense of the Faith, p. 315.1 (William Henry Branson)

… . We refer to the interpretation given by Seventh-day Adventists to the prophecy of the 2300 days of the eighth and ninth chapters of Daniel.

51796 In Defense of the Faith, p. 347.4 (William Henry Branson)

… , and reference is made to the influences which were at work among the outside nations. She says:

51797 In Defense of the Faith, p. 350.5 (William Henry Branson)

… here referring to blood that had, been needlessly shed by the mismanagement of certain men in the Northern Army who were in sympathy with slavery. No one rejoiced …

51798 In Defense of the Faith, p. 353.3 (William Henry Branson)

… dress referred to. In the first quotation let the reader notice that it is the “so-called” reform dress, that was condemned by Mrs. White. The one referred to thus …

51799 In Defense of the Faith, p. 353.6 (William Henry Branson)

… , one referring to the “American costume,“ and the other the reform dress as it was later developed. That the reader may be assured that it was this ultra-short …

51800 In Defense of the Faith, p. 354.1 (William Henry Branson)

… was referred to Deuteronomy 22:5 : ‘The woman shall not wear that which pertains unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all that do so are abomination …