Search for: Jehova*
4281 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 338.5 (Uriah Smith)
… ,” or Jehovah; but, as an eminent expositor of the prophecies judiciously remarks, in considering the pronouns of the Bible we are to interpret them according …
4282 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 608.1 (Uriah Smith)
… that Jehovah denounces against so Heaven-daring a course the most terrible threatening that his Word contains?
4283 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 667.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah, must be the work of the papal beast, that power which was to oppose God, and try to exalt himself above him. but this is the very work in reference to …
4284 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 668.3 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah’s creative work, is torn from its place in the decalogue, and a false and counterfeit Sabbath, the first day of the week, is set up in its stead.
4285 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 670.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah and enthrone that of the beast. Stripped of all disguises, it is simply setting up a counterfeit sabbath of its own on the first day of the week, in …
4286 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 672.5 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah as direct and explicit as that by which he placed it upon the day in the beginning. No one claims that this has ever been done, and he could not prove …
4287 Daniel and The Revelation, p. 674.3 (Uriah Smith)
… King Jehovah, which James declares is a law of liberty, and which shall judge us at the last day. God does not have different standards of judgment for different …
4288 Fundamental Principles of Seventh-day Adventists, p. 4.1 (Uriah Smith)
… by Jehovah from Sinai, engraven on tables of stone, and deposited in the ark, which was in consequence called the “ark of the covenant,” or testament ( Numbers 10 …
4289 Here and Hereafter, p. 44.3 (Uriah Smith)
“And Jehovah God formed the man (Hebrew, the Adam) dust from the ground, and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living animal. Some of our …
4290 Here and Hereafter, p. 132.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah himself, the Creator of man, — against whose sentence, and the sunlight of whose word, it does not become puny mortals to oppose their shortsighted …
4291 Here and Hereafter, p. 319.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah? Yet the Bible has been tautological enough plainly to state this fact. And it would seem that it might have carried its “tautology” a little further …
4292 Looking Unto Jesus, p. 41.1 (Uriah Smith)
… Lord Jehovah, and the unconditional surrender of the field to sin. Could the law have been relaxed, or changed, or abolished, man could have been released from …
4293 Looking Unto Jesus, p. 70.3 (Uriah Smith)
… by Jehovah himself. The temple building was a structure of unsurpassed magnificence and glory, and there was nothing to hinder the Levitical worship from …
4294 Looking Unto Jesus, p. 231.1 (Uriah Smith)
… , dethrone Jehovah, wrench from its position the world’s mercy-seat of pardon and salvation, and with his would-be omnipotent finger, mutilate the records …
4295 Looking Unto Jesus, p. 261.5 (Uriah Smith)
… , for Jehovah, the other La-Azazel, for Azazel, for the Devil; and he takes the transaction to signify that subjection of Christ to Satan which is implied in the …
4296 Looking Unto Jesus, p. 277.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah, immutable, eternal. Then was discovered the connection between this subject and the seal of the living God, the sealing work, the last message of …
4297 Man’s Nature and Destiny, p. 21.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah himself, so that he will live as long as God exists.
4298 Man’s Nature and Destiny, p. 37.3 (Uriah Smith)
“And Jehovah God formed the man (Heb., the Adam) dust from the ground, and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living animal. Some of our readers …
4299 Man’s Nature and Destiny, p. 198.1 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah himself, the Creator of man, against whose sentence, and the sunlight of whose word, it does not become puny mortals to oppose their shallow dictums …
4300 Man’s Nature and Destiny, p. 312.3 (Uriah Smith)
… of Jehovah? Yet the Bible has been tautological enough to plainly state this fact. And it would seem that it might have carried its “tautology” a little further …