Search for: Haskell
4001 Over My Shoulder, p. 92.1 (Ella May White Robinson)
… Mrs. Haskell and Miss McEnterfer pounded in the nails. We younger folk followed along after the builders, cleaning paint off the windows and removing plaster …
4002 Over My Shoulder, p. 92.5 (Ella May White Robinson)
… Mrs. Haskell taught the Bible classes and trained students in evangelism.
4003 Sister White, p. 76.1 (Arthur Whitefield Spalding)
… Brother Haskell to Sister White. “Our work is new there, and the needs of our people are many. If you would go and strengthen them in their faith by your courage …
4004 Sister White, p. 76.2 (Arthur Whitefield Spalding)
… , Brother Haskell had been the first Seventh-day Adventist to go to Australia and New Zealand. These lands are about as far away from America as you can go, farther …
4005 Sister White, p. 126.6 (Arthur Whitefield Spalding)
… , Elder Haskell, Elder Daniells, Elder Starr, and others. They thanked God that He had given Sister White to us for so long.
4006 Stories of My Grandmother, p. 168.1 (Ella May White Robinson)
Elder S. N. Haskell was present at the meeting, and he said, “I intend to go to Australia.” Elder J. O. Corliss, who was there, also said he wanted to go to Australia.
4007 Stories of My Grandmother, p. 168.2 (Ella May White Robinson)
… Elder Haskell and Elder Corliss were among them.
4008 Stories of My Grandmother, p. 171.4 (Ella May White Robinson)
… . N. Haskell, and a few other workers she boarded the steamship Alameda bound for Australia. While crossing the Pacific, she was shown in a night vision many things …
4009 There Shines A Light, p. 45.2 (Arthur Whitefield Spalding)
… , and Haskell; but one and all they listened to the voice of the Spirit of prophecy in times of stress and crises of policy. Their decisions and their methods …
4010 There Shines A Light, p. 80.3 (Arthur Whitefield Spalding)
… N. Haskell, one of the pioneers, and the father of the missionary literature work among Seventh-day Adventists, was sent with a company of workers to Australia …
4011 A Prophet Among You, p. 242.1 (T. Housel Jemison)
… Elder Haskell’s suggestion and asked Mrs. White and her son to leave for Australia that autumn. The mother and son were willing to go, and they arrived there …
4012 A Prophet Among You, p. 399.3 (T. Housel Jemison)
… . N. Haskell in Africa. It was a letter of encouragement to a man facing many difficulties and combating discouragement. Less than a year later, on June 9, 1896 …
4013 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 443 (Francis D. Nichol)
Letters Between Haskell and White
4014 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 443.1 (Francis D. Nichol)
… . N. Haskell, a key leader in the denomination, and particularly in the Tract Society work, wrote to W. C. White and raised this question: “Now if it [Mrs. White’s book …
4015 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 443.2 (Francis D. Nichol)
… it. Haskell, writing at the very time when this withdrawal is supposed to have taken place, not only fails to hint of such a step, but suggests a further edition …
4016 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 443.4 (Francis D. Nichol)
But let us go on with our examination of the Haskell letters.
4017 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 443.5 (Francis D. Nichol)
… , 1884, Haskell writes to White from Battle Creek, Michigan, and again raises the question of preparing a special colporteur edition. This time he suggests …
4018 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 444.1 (Francis D. Nichol)
… , 1884, Haskell writes from South Lancaster, Massachusetts, a brief note to White. All that it contains regarding the book is this: “R & H [Review and Herald] just sent …
4019 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 444.2 (Francis D. Nichol)
… .” But Haskell’s letter reveals that a year after the initial printing the Review and Herald in Battle Creek was awaiting only the approval of W. C. White before …
4020 Ellen G. White and Her Critics, p. 444.4 (Francis D. Nichol)
We do not have a copy of his reply to Haskell. Not until 1885 did the White office begin to use typewriters, and thus to keep copies of correspondence. Evidently his reply was negative, for we find him writing thus to Haskell on March 11, 1885: