The Story of our Health Message

Dress Discussed in the Churches

The ministers, as they visited the churches, regarded the newly adopted healthful dress as an important feature of the health reform and gave it a place in their discourses. As they reported their work, they frequently mentioned the favorable reception of this portion of their message. Hence Elder D. M. Canright, in commenting on a special meeting in Portland, Maine, wrote: SHM 167.5

“The modesty of the short dress is not the smallest thing to be considered. ... With the reform dress on, all exposure is entirely avoided. After seeing it worn, I think it is the most modest dress I have ever seen, and I am not alone in this opinion. SHM 167.6

“All these things were freely talked over here. Nearly all decided in favor of it, and others had but very slight objections to it. ... Most of the sisters resolved as soon as consistent to adopt it. My wife, who wears one, has assisted them in preparing their dresses. They have adopted the health reform quite thoroughly.”—The Review and Herald, June 18, 1867. SHM 168.1

For about four years or more considerable was written in our denominational publications about the advantages accruing from the consistent use of the health dress. Many willingly and gladly adapted their garb to conform to the principles of health as well as of modesty, which prompted the designing of the “health reform dress.” But its acceptance was not general, and there was opposition and criticism. Some, forgetting “that none were to be compelled to wear the reform dress,” “sought to control others’ conscience by their own.” “With extremists, this reform seemed to constitute the sum and substance of their religion. It was the theme of conversation and the burden of their hearts. ... Instead of prizing the dress for its real advantages, they seemed to be proud of its singularity.” So wrote Mrs. White, in 1881, in answer to the question, “Why has this dress been laid aside?” And she continued: SHM 168.2

“To those who put it on reluctantly, from a sense of duty, it became a grievous yoke. Still others, who were apparently the most zealous reformers, manifested a sad lack of order and neatness in their dress.”—Testimonies for the Church 4:635-637. SHM 168.3

Consequently, “because that which was given as a blessing was turned into a curse, the burden of advocating the reform dress was removed.”—E. G. White Manuscript 167, 1897. SHM 168.4