The Signs of the Times, vol. 11

December 24, 1885

“The Law of God-for Whom Made” The Signs of the Times, 11, 49.

E. J. Waggoner

Last week, under the head of “Principles and Precepts,” we showed that not simply the great principles of love, but the embodiment of those principles in the ten commandments, are the rule of life for all men in all ages; that the law is adapted to pure and holy beings, and is kept even by the angels in Heaven. After one additional thought on this point, we shall proceed to notice in detail some things that are offered as objections to this view. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.1

The difference between sinful man and the law of God, is shown by Paul in the following words: “For we know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under sin.” Romans 7:14. Between things spiritual and things carnal there is no possibility for the slightest union, as is proved by Galatians 5:17: “For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other.” And therefore, as a consequence of this implacable enmity, the words of Paul follow very naturally: “So that ye cannot do the things that ye would.” This last statement is made more emphatic in Romans 8:7: “The carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.2

That by the term “law” Paul refers to the ten commandments, and not to certain abstract principles, is easily seen from Romans 7:7 and 2:17-23. The fact, then, is made plain that men cannot meet the requirements of the ten commandments, because the commandments are spiritual, and men are carnal. “They that are in the flesh cannot please God.” Romans 8:8. Now it is required of all men that they please God, and therefore the apostle proceeds to show how it may be done: “But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you.” Romans 8:9. A man in whom the Spirit of God dwells is certainly spiritual, and therefore just in harmony with the law of God, which is also spiritual. And so we see that instead of the law being adapted only to sinful beings, it is especially adapted to the righteous; for they are the only ones who can continue in its requirements. It is the keeping of the ten commandments (which can be done only by those who are “in Christ”) that makes men spiritual; when they cease to keep the law, they cease to be spiritual. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.3

In supposed opposition to the position which we have taken, is 1 Timothy 1:9, 10: “Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.” Whoever imagines that this text means that a righteous man is not under obligations to keep the law, has never read more than the first clause. Since the law is “made for” those who steal, lie, kill, commit adultery, blaspheme, etc., we should gather that it forbids all those things, and so it does. Then according to the common supposition, the righteous, for whom the law is not “made,” are not prohibited from these practices! A necessary conclusion which is so absurd, shows plainly that the premises are wrong. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.4

But if it is the duty of Christians to keep the law, how shall we understand Paul’s statement that the law is “made” for the wicked, and not for the righteous? We can answer this question in no better way than by quoting a portion of Dr. Clarke’s comment on 1 Timothy 1:9:- SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.5

“He [the apostle] does not say that the law was not MADE for the righteous man; but ou keoti, it does not LIE against a righteous man, because he does not transgress against it; but it lies against the wicked; for such, as the apostle mentions, have broken it, and grievously too, and are condemned by it. The word keittai, lies, refers to the custom of writing laws on boards, and hanging them up in public places, within reach of every man, that they might be read by all; thus all would see against whom the law lay.” SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.6

This is exactly in harmony with the primal meaning of the word law,-“something laid,”-as given in the article last week. The law is “laid” for the benefit of all; it lies against the man who violates it, and crushes him if he persists in his disobedience; but it does not lie against the righteous, because they “walk in the law of the Lord.” There is no opposition between them and the law; to them the law is indeed “the way of peace,” because they delight in it. But let one of the righteous ones step out of this way, and that step will bring the law against him. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.7

And now to the statement that Christians are in duty bound to keep the ten commandments, and that, in fact, that is the badge of their discipleship, we must add another statement which necessarily follows, namely, that this delightful duty will be theirs throughout eternity, just as it has been that of the angels ever since they were created. “Angels that excel in strength” do the commandments of God, “hearkening unto the voice of his word.” Psalm 103:20. And when the kingdom of God is established upon earth, God’s will (the ten commandments) will be done on earth even as it is now done in Heaven. Matthew 6:10. As long as the throne of God endures, the ten commandments will be the law by which God rules his vast Government, the foundation of his throne. E. J. W. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.8

“How Does It Happen” The Signs of the Times, 11, 49.

E. J. Waggoner

When people for the first time hear or read the truth concerning the Sabbath, the nature of man, the coming of the Lord, and other Bible doctrines held by Seventh-day Adventists, they frequently ask, “If these things are so plainly taught in the Bible, why is it that they have not been taught by Bible students in past ages? Why is it that Luther, Calvin, Wesley, and other learned and pious theologians did not see these doctrines? SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.9

A satisfactory answer to these questions may easily be given. We must consider the circumstances under which those men began their labors. We must remember that when the Reformation began, the Bible had been for several hundred years a proscribed book. The art of printing was unknown, and books were necessarily copied by hand. This was a tedious process, and made it impossible for poor people to own them. Besides this, the only copies of the Bible in existence were in the original Greek and Hebrew, or in Latin; and when we remember that Greek and Hebrew were rarely taught, even in the universities, and that few learned men had any knowledge of those languages, Latin being the only language of educated people, we see that the number of people who could use the Bible, even had they possessed a copy, was very limited. Still further, when we remember that the few manuscript copies of the Bible that were in existence were the property of the Catholic Church, which had no interest in circulating them among the people, but on the contrary, kept these copies carefully concealed, we see that it was next to impossible for anybody to have any personal acquaintance with the word of God. Says D’Aubigne:- SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.10

“The priests having taken into their own hands the disposing [of] a salvation which belonged only to God, had thereby secured a sufficient hold on the respect of the people. What need had they [the priests] to study sacred learning? It was no longer their office to explain the Scriptures, but to grant letters of indulgence; and for the fulfilling of that ministry, it was unnecessary to have acquired any great learning. In country parts, says Wimpheling, they appointed as preachers poor wretches whom they had taken from beggary, and who had been cooks, musicians, huntsmen, stable-boys, and even worse. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.11

“The superior clergy themselves were sunk in great ignorance. A bishop of Danfeldt congratulated himself on never having learned Greek or Hebrew. The monks asserted that all heresies arose from these languages, but especially from the Greek. ‘Greek,’ continued he, ‘is a modern language but recently invented, and against which we must be upon our guard. As to Hebrew, my dear brethren, it is certain that whoever studies that immediately becomes a Jew.’ ... Thomas Linacer, a learned and celebrated divine, had never read the New Testament. Drawing near his end (in 1524), he called for it, but quickly threw it from him with an oath because his eye had caught the words, ‘But I say unto you, Swear not at all.’ ‘Either this is not the gospel,’ said he, ‘or we are not Christians.’ Even the schools of theology in Paris did not scruple to declare before the Parliament. ‘There is an end of religion if the study of Hebrew and Greek is permitted.’ SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.12

“If here and there among the clergy some learning existed, it was not in sacred literature. The Ciceronians of Italy affect great contempt for the Bible on account of its style. Men who arrogated to themselves the title of priests of Christ’s church, translated the words of the Holy Ghost into the style of Virgil and of Horace to accommodate them to the ears of men of taste. The Cardinal Bemlo wrote always instead of ‘the Holy Spirit,’ ‘the breath of the celestial zephyr;’ for ‘remission of sins’ he substituted ‘the pity of the manes and of the gods;’ and instead of ‘Christ the Son of God,’ ‘Minerva sprung from the brows of Jupiter.’ Finding, one day, the respectable Sadoletus employed on the translation of the epistle to the Romans, ‘Leave these childish productions,’ said he, ‘such puerilities do not become a sensible man.’” SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.13

It was only a few weeks ago that a Catholic priest in Montreal, speaking of the Protestant Bible, said to his congregation: “I want to be understood that the Church forbids you to read those Bibles. If you have any of them in your house, burn them; and if you do not want to burn them, bring them to me, and I will burn them.” SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.14

It was amidst influences like these that the Reformation began. Luther was twenty years old before he had even seen a copy of the Bible. Now if any one wonders why he did not, in his lifetime, grasp all the truths which it contains, let him try an experiment: Let him give the Bible to a man who has never seen the book, and see how long it will take him to thoroughly understand it. Let the reader consider his own case, and see how great an understanding he has of the Bible; then remember that there can scarcely be a parallel to Luther’s case nowadays, because the influence of the Bible is everywhere. The people who have never read it have met its teachings in books, or perhaps in sermons, or in their intercourse with other people. When we think of these things, instead of wondering that Luther did not understand more of the Bible, we are lost in astonishment that he was able to grasp so many of its truths as he did. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.15

When we come to the time of Wesley, we find that he had a still better understanding of the Bible than Luther had. This was not because he was a more talented or a more devoted man than Luther, but because he had better advantages. He had the benefit of all of Luther’s study and experience, as well as of that of many other learned men. And as we come down a hundred years later, to our own time, it is no egotism to say that we may have a deeper insight into the truths of the Bible than Wesley had, because we have the aid of his research, and that of Bible students since his time. It would indeed be a cause for shame to any intelligent Bible student if he did not profit by the light thrown upon the word by those men of God. Besides this, we must remember that there are special truths for special occasions. Peter speaks of the “present truth.” There is such a truth for every age. The special truth for the time of Luther was justification by faith. The people were swallowed up in dead forms and useless ceremonies, and needed instruction in the first principles of the gospel, of which the world was totally ignorant. All the preaching needed to be directed to that one thing. As the Bible became a common book, and the doctrine of justification by faith and not by works was more generally understood, other points could be brought in. As we come down to the early portion of this century, we see a special prominence given to the doctrine of Christ’s second coming. Ministers of all denominations seemed moved by a common impulse to study the prophecies, and to teach them to the people. A little later the doctrine of eternal life only in Christ, and that received at the resurrection, began to be preached quite extensively. This was a natural consequence of the preaching of the second advent. And still later we find special attention given to the law of God, and the Sabbath, until now the truth on this point has been circulated throughout the world. To be sure, there have been a few people in all generations who have held all, or nearly all, of these truths; but the attention of the people as a whole has been directed to only one new truth at a time. SITI December 24, 1885, page 777.16

Our Lord, in speaking to his disciples, recognized the fact that the human mind must be led into truth step by step when he said: “I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.” John 16:12. It will be noticed, however, that while in different generations one truth has been made especially prominent, the truths which have been brought out in preceding generations are not ignored, but the new truths are added to them; and thus is fulfilled the statement that “the path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day.” Proverbs 4:18. SITI December 24, 1885, page 778.1

It is not for us to spend time wondering why former generations did not have certain doctrines preached to them, but simply to inquire, Are these things so? This may be easily determined by the Bible, and we should, instead of questioning, rejoice that new light is given to us, and should walk in the light while we have the light, lest darkness come upon us. E. J. W. SITI December 24, 1885, page 778.2